TradInvest
Trading PsychologyBiasesBeginner Traders

Trading Biases Explained: How to Overcome Psychology Traps in Markets

Sep 08, 202510 min readBy TradInvest Editorial Team
Trading Biases Explained: How to Overcome Psychology Traps in Markets

Introduction – a tale of two traders

Ali and Maya began investing around the same time. They were classmates, both fascinated by the idea that money could grow on its own. Ali kept his profits, often selling his winners quickly and nursing his losers in the hope they would recover. Maya, by contrast, recorded every trade in a journal, read widely and shared her thoughts with a community. A year later, their portfolios looked very different. Ali’s performance was erratic and he felt anxious with each market swing. Maya’s account grew more steadily; she felt calm and confident. The difference wasn’t luck—it was the way their minds engaged with the market.

Trading is not just about charts and numbers. It is about understanding how our brains perceive risk, reward and probability. As Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman explains in Thinking, Fast and Slow, our “System 1” brain responds quickly and intuitively, while “System 2” is analytical and deliberate. When money is on the line, System 1 often hijacks our decisions. This blog explores the mental traps that often derail traders and suggests practical strategies to deal with them. Each section uses a story, analogy or research finding to make the concepts relatable.

The anatomy of bias – why our brains misfire

Humans are wired for survival, not for the abstract world of financial markets. Many of the biases we’ll discuss evolved because they were useful in our ancestors’ environments—helping them avoid danger or take quick action. In trading, however, these impulses can lead to poor decisions. The following biases are among the most common:

  • Loss aversion – the tendency to feel the pain of losses more intensely than the pleasure of equivalent gains1.
  • Anchoring bias – relying too heavily on the first piece of information we receive2.
  • Overconfidence – overestimating our skills and underestimating risk3.
  • Herd (bandwagon) behaviour – following the crowd into bubbles and crashes4.
  • Confirmation bias – seeking information that confirms our existing beliefs5.
  • Recency/availability bias – overweighting recent events over long‑term probabilities6.
  • Gambler’s fallacy – believing random events are due for a correction7.
  • Survivorship bias – focusing on winners while ignoring the losers8.

Understanding these biases is the first step toward taming them. Let’s explore each in depth.

Loss aversion – why a small loss hurts like a punch

Ali’s first big trade was in a technology stock. It went up 15 % in a week, and he sold immediately, delighted with his gain. A month later the stock had doubled, and Ali began chasing other “hot tips.” Soon he found himself holding a different stock that had dropped 20 %, but he refused to sell because he couldn’t bear the thought of locking in the loss. This is classic loss aversion, which behavioural finance pioneer Amos Tversky likened to “the strong reaction to losses that is about twice as powerful as the pleasure of gains”1.

Abstract balance scale showing the heavy weight of trading losses compared to gains

Researchers have found that the pain of losing is roughly twice the pleasure of winning1, and that loss‑averse investors often cling to losing positions or sell winners too early1. Professionals tend to show lower loss aversion9, suggesting that experience and discipline help.

Tackling loss aversion

  • Set pre‑defined stop‑loss rules. Decide how much you’re willing to lose before you enter a trade.
  • Use position sizing. Risk only a small percentage of capital on any single trade.
  • Rebalance regularly. Disciplined rebalancing and asset allocation can counteract loss aversion1.
  • Reframe losses as tuition. View small losses as the cost of learning.

Anchoring bias – the phantom price tag

Imagine you’re shopping for a watch. You see one priced at ₹50,000 and decide it’s too expensive. Later you find another watch priced at ₹20,000 and think it’s a bargain—even if you didn’t want to spend more than ₹10,000. This is anchoring, where the first number you see becomes an “anchor” that colours all subsequent judgments. In trading, anchors might be the price at which you bought a stock or an analyst’s target.

Anchoring is pervasive; researchers found that almost half of papers on cognitive biases focus on it2. Anchors can even create positive outcomes: high anchors sometimes help retailers avoid understocking2. However, they often distort forecasts and persist despite repeated tasks2.

Tackling anchoring

  • Focus on value, not price. Estimate the intrinsic value of an asset rather than fixating on past prices.
  • Challenge your assumptions. Ask yourself, “If I didn’t own this asset, would I buy it today?”
  • Beware of arbitrary targets. Treat analyst price targets as opinions, not facts.
  • Use range forecasts. Thinking in ranges prevents a single anchor from dominating your decision.

Overconfidence – when skill meets illusion

Maya joined a stock‑picking contest and came fourth. She felt proud but also realised how much she didn’t know. Ali, who came eighth, dismissed it as luck and doubled his trading size. Overconfidence often manifests as an inflated belief in our abilities, leading us to underestimate risks and ignore contrary evidence.

A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences shows that investors’ memories of past performance are positively biased3. Participants recalled past returns as better than reality and remembered winners more than losers3. These memory biases were associated with overconfidence and increased trading frequency3. Overconfident investors trade more, take on too much leverage, overreact to signals and suffer from the “winner’s curse”10.

Tackling overconfidence

  • Keep a trading journal. Recording every trade, including losers, counters memory bias.
  • Use checklists. Pilots and surgeons avoid overconfidence with checklists; traders can too.
  • Seek feedback. External perspectives help identify blind spots.
  • Limit leverage and trade size. Setting strict margin rules protects your capital.

Herd behaviour – following the crowd off a cliff

A classic scene in markets is the bandwagon effect: a parabolic rise in prices followed by a sudden crash. The Decision Lab describes how investors may buy because others are buying4. Late entrants pay inflated prices and then suffer when the bubble bursts4. People follow the herd because it provides a quick heuristic and satisfies our desire to fit in11.

Arrows moving in one direction with one breaking away, symbolizing herd behavior in trading

Tackling herd behaviour

  • Slow down your decisions. Pausing and reflecting can reduce bandwagon effects11.
  • Build independent thesis. Write down why you believe an asset is undervalued.
  • Diversify information sources. Don’t rely solely on social media or chat forums.
  • Remember mean reversion. When valuations detach from fundamentals, caution is warranted.

Confirmation bias – hearing what you want to hear

If you’ve ever googled “Why my stock will go up” instead of “What are the risks?”, you’ve experienced confirmation bias. It causes investors to cling to underperforming stocks and ignore warning signs5. It fosters overconfidence and poor diversification5.

Tackling confirmation bias

  • Actively seek disconfirming evidence. Look for reasons you might be wrong.
  • Diversify information sources. Use diverse research and consult advisors12.
  • Set objective rules. Pre‑defined criteria reduce selective perception.
  • Practice mindfulness. Reflection reveals hidden biases.

Recency bias – trapped in the moment

During the 2020 market crash, many investors sold in panic, expecting the free fall to continue. Within months the market rebounded, leaving sellers behind. This is recency bias—also called availability bias—where people overweight recent events and neglect long‑term probabilities6. It explains phenomena like panic selling or buying into a bubble because “it’s going up every day.”

Timeline graphic with magnifying glass on recent events to show recency bias in investing

Tackling recency bias

  • Stick to your strategy. Pre‑defined plans or robo‑advisors can remove the temptation to react to every headline13.
  • Review long‑term data. Look at charts over years, not weeks.
  • Journal your emotions. Revisiting notes later reminds you how quickly sentiments change.
  • Avoid news overload. Constant exposure amplifies recency bias.

Gambler’s fallacy – chasing patterns in randomness

Suppose a fair coin lands heads four times in a row. Many people will bet heavily on tails next, thinking it is “due.” This is the gambler’s fallacy, the belief that random events are self‑correcting7. In trading, this manifests when a trader believes that a winning streak must end or a losing streak will reverse.

Tackling gambler’s fallacy

  • Understand independence. Each trade is independent unless there is a structural reason connecting them.
  • Use statistical thinking. Familiarise yourself with probability and statistics.
  • Avoid revenge trading. Stick to your plan and avoid doubling down to recover losses.

Survivorship bias – learning only from winners

If you search for “successful trading strategies,” you’ll find countless stories of people who made fortunes. You rarely hear about those who failed. Survivorship bias is the error of focusing on the survivors while ignoring those that disappeared. Ignoring delisted companies inflates returns and underestimates risk8. For example, an index that removes 30 of 100 original companies may show a return of 10 %, but including the failed companies might reveal only 5 %8.

Tree growing from a trading journal with branches swirling into abstract shapes

Tackling survivorship bias

  • Study failures. Research what unsuccessful traders did and why their strategies failed.
  • Use complete data. Include delisted stocks and closed funds when back‑testing.
  • Be skeptical of “too‑good‑to‑be‑true” results. Ask whether the data includes only survivors.
  • Diversify across asset classes. A diversified portfolio reduces the impact of any one failure.

Conclusion – the art of mindful trading

Biases are not flaws to be eliminated; they are part of being human. Recognising them allows us to create systems and habits that reduce their negative impact. In our story, the difference between Ali and Maya came down to awareness and intentionality. Ali let his instincts drive his trades; Maya reflected, learned and adapted.

Whether you’re just starting or looking to refine your skills, the journey toward mastering your mind is as important as mastering the market. Use the insights from research and the wisdom of those who have walked the path. Practice, observe and adjust. Your future self (and your portfolio) will thank you.

Wide cinematic panorama of a trader silhouette overlooking glowing market data lines and candlestick charts


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. What is a trading journal and why do I need one?
A trading journal is a record of every trade you make, including entry and exit points, the reason for taking the trade, and your emotions before, during and after. Journaling helps you identify patterns in your behaviour, learn from mistakes and refine your strategy. Without a journal, it’s easy to misremember your performance and fall prey to overconfidence or recency bias.

2. How can TradInvest help improve my trading?
TradInvest offers a free trading journal with limited insights to help you get started. For advanced and pro members, we provide data‑driven analytics and AI‑powered coaching. The platform highlights your behavioural patterns, helps you track performance and offers personalised suggestions to improve discipline and consistency.

3. Are the insights truly AI‑driven?
Yes. Our AI models analyse your trading data to identify tendencies such as hesitation, overtrading or emotion‑driven decisions. The insights are grounded in behavioural finance research and are designed to be actionable.

4. I’m a beginner; is TradInvest suitable for me?
Absolutely. TradInvest is built for traders at all levels. Beginners benefit from structured journaling and educational resources, while intermediate and advanced traders can leverage deeper analytics and coaching to refine their edge.

5. Is there a free plan?
Yes. The basic plan includes a free trading journal with limited insights. You can upgrade anytime to unlock advanced analytics and AI‑based coaching.


How to Improve?

Ready to take control of your trading psychology? Join TradInvest today and start journaling your trades for free. Unlock deeper insights and personalised AI coaching with our pro plan. Whether you’re intraday, swing or positional, our platform is designed to help you understand yourself and the markets better.

👉 Start your free journal now at TradInvest.in

Footnotes

  1. Loss Aversion: Definition, Risks in Trading, and How to Minimize — Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/loss-psychology.asp 2 3 4 5

  2. Cognitive Biases: Risk Aversion, Anchoring, and Overconfidence — PsychologyWriting. https://psychologywriting.com/cognitive-biases-risk-aversion-anchoring-and-overconfidence/ 2 3 4

  3. Aisworth et al., Investor memory of past performance is positively biased and predicts overconfidence, PNAS. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8433511/ 2 3 4

  4. Bandwagon Effect — The Decision Lab. https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/bandwagon-effect 2 3

  5. The Impact of Confirmation Bias in Investing — Nasdaq. https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/impact-confirmation-bias-investing 2 3

  6. Recency (Availability) Bias — Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/recency-availability-bias-5206686 2

  7. Gambler's Fallacy — The Decision Lab. https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/gamblers-fallacy 2

  8. Survivorship Bias in Market Data — Bookmap. https://bookmap.com/blog/survivorship-bias-in-market-data-what-traders-need-to-know 2 3

  9. Professionals and loss aversion differences (summary cited from Investopedia in 1).

  10. Additional effects related to overconfidence (derived from PNAS study in 3).

  11. Why we follow the herd (heuristics & social fit) — synthesis from The Decision Lab in 4. 2

  12. Mitigating confirmation bias — derived from Nasdaq in 5.

  13. On sticking to plans/robo‑advisors — derived from Investopedia in 6.

Related posts